The Front CoverIn wind resource assessment, the conventional approach to meteorological (met) mast siting has emphasised distance, recommending maintaining a maximum separation distance between each met site and the proposed wind turbine locations. This industry-accepted method assumes that shorter distances translate to better representativeness. But is distance truly the metric that matters most? The article on page 6 challenges this long-held belief. Publisher's NoteDaily legislative hurdles for renewable energy in the USAFeaturesDoes Distance Really Matter in Met Campaigns?
By Liz Walls and Erin Roekle, One Power Company, USA By Manu Centeno-Telleria, Researcher and Lecturer, Mondragon University, Spain
By Richard Chen, Customer Success Manager, Miros, Norway By Per Ängskog, Kourosh Tatar and José Chilo, University of Gävle, Sweden
Windtech FutureWind Turbines on BuildingsBy Ahmad Hemami, McGill University, Montreal, Canada View from InsideBy Endri Lico, Principal Analyst, Global Wind Supply Chain and Technology, Wood Mackenzie, Denmark Latest News
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||